Slumbot overbets the pot all the time, and rapport loto 8 novembre 2017 Ive learned to gain an edge (Im up 1/hand after 10k hands of play) by overbetting the pot all the time.
Dong was concerned that Jason might lose as much as hed won, so it was nice to hear that Jason only lost about -15,000 while Dong had won 30,000 chips.
No frills interface, no animation, no annoying sound, no in-app purchases.
Predictions I predict that with two days of practice and some time to compare notes, the four pros will hold the AI close to break-even going forward.The scoreboard tells us why they ended on time instead: There will be 120,000 hands played over two weeks to avoid last years controversy where humans claimed victory, while the CMU poker group noted the small sample and thus a statistical tie.At some point, Dan Mcaulay, slot machine payback percentages las vegas buried in a streak of bad luck hands (he lost and Jimmy won, playing the same cards from the other side pointed out how human the AIs strategy appeared.Its hard to know.What if it starts betting in those weird.75x pot amounts?We laughed when Jason said he folded the 42-suited preflop, and did not get a chance to chase down the AIs Aces.However, to make this approach feasible in heads-up no-limit Texas holdema game with vastly more unique situations than there are atoms in the universea simplified abstraction of the game is often needed.(R ead my followup story for an update on the match.
A similar type of transfer learning would be an interesting application for multi-player Holdem.
Meanwhile as its become more clear that the AI is #winning, the match has gotten increased attention both in the mainstream media, and especially amongst poker fans and AI fans on Twitter.This is a good place to start, and my predictions are looking pretty good, 2/3 of the way through.).I do think that a future poker AI could improve upon Libratus, whether it would be through more online solving, or with an adversarial network that finds equilibrium solvers remaining weaknesses and exploit them more directly.New in Heads Up AI Poker.6.1.Given enough practice, I wonder if the AI could learn to seek out those tough spots, and push opponents even harder.Thus unless the AI has consistent bugs in important weird corner cases, it is hard to see how people could both play solid enough not to lose, and well enough to exploit the AI in the cases where it is possible.Until now, competitive AI approaches in imperfect information games have typically reasoned about the entire game, producing a complete strategy prior to play.To a strong but non-professional player, it looked like very good poker.Doug Polk (center) and the Human team: Jason, Dong, Jimmy and Daniel.An AI could certainly do more to exploit the patterns of human play.Meanwhile online, CMU poker research group graduate Sam Ganzfried was impressed by the computers play on the first day.
Description of Heads Up AI Poker (from google play).